It is an unfortunate fact that the bulk of humanity is too limited in its mental vision to weigh with patience and intelligence the reality around them. Feminists doubly so.

Nymronaut - Droide (by 666MrDoom)

http://www.nightstalkerband.com/
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Nights…

Helpless Homolka: How Justice was Battered by Feminist Censorship (by PaulMcKeever)

lavidaesundesmadre: jimb0slyf3: This should be a top news story. blessings

lavidaesundesmadre:

jimb0slyf3:

This should be a top news story.

blessings

(via oratorasaurus)

heroinfriday:

mr-cappadocia:

sweep-pass-submit:

Fuck, this makes my blood boil.

A woman who is clearly not following the rules of the road and causing a traffic jam in excess of 10 cars gets into a verbal altercation with a cyclist who is calling out her shit driving.

She has no problem opening the door of the car and screaming at the guy, until she has had enough and then those magic words come out of her mouth:

“Help, I’m a woman on my own! I’m being threatened!”

Nope, sorry. You weren’t. No one threatened you. But how interesting that you turned into a fragile little flower the moment it might benefit you.

This reminds me of a number of other stories, including one where a group of women accused a taxi driver of rape over a $13 cab fare. Whether you call it “benevolent sexism” or “misandary”, there is an environment that causes some women to believe that acting in this way is beneficial to them.

It is only natural. A good analogy is having an illegal tax loophole only for women. Obviously you would expect a number of women to try taking advantage of it. Expecting anything less would be ignorant of human nature. What we see in stories like these is just a probable reaction to the gender binary kyriarchy that we live in.

The most important thing that I don’t think most people will catch onto… is that *it worked*.

Sometimes I wish I never watched the videos you guys post because they just make me so fucking angry.

-Liv

(via it-goes-both-ways)

Barbarossa Menu - Add this at the end of your baiting video (by MGTOW data base)

oratorasaurus:

fuckingradfems:

For those who missed it the first time around…I made a thing. And it is on the front page of AVFM and Paul Elam offered me a writing position and I’m freaking out and oh my god, today was incredible for me

I love all of you sexy wonderful people

Awesome news!

SHOCKER; Judge Blames Mentally Retarded Boy In Teacher Sex Case (by ViolentWomenAmongUs)

oratorasaurus: thefourwindsbar: Say it with me everyone: Stopping violence against women is a fight to get women taken seriously. Violence against men isn’t taken seriously because women are perceived as weak and fragile When women are taken seriously, violence against men will be too. Because right now it is culturally unfathomable that a man couldn’t defend himself against a woman. Your problems stem from anti-feminism and misogyny. Now get your ass on the right side and stop trying fighting us. We have the same problem. No. Women are taken far too seriously. Look at the Primary Aggressor laws, the courtroom assessment PACs, lack of due process in college rape accusations where they base everything on what the woman says, or how DNA testing to prove if someone is/is not the father doesn’t count as evidence to determine child support but the woman’s word is.  Sorry, but us having the same problem would be that women and men BOTH get taken to jail whenever the cops respond to a domestic complaint. It would be that BOTH men and women have nearly all of their take home cash go to alimony and BOTH genders get sent to jail when they miss a month or two. It would be when BOTH genders are equally homeless and suicide victims. It would be when BOTH genders are considered disposable. It would be when hitting a man or a woman is funny and laughable and when either gender tried to defend themselves that’s when it gets real because everyone knows that men and woman simply deserve to be hit, otherwise, why would they be getting hit, right? First off thank you for reblogging my picture thefourwindsbar but you are completely mistaken in your interpretation of it, and deliberately so I think. MRAs are the right side, feminists are not. The problem is feminists. It was feminists who fought against gender neutral language in laws like VAWA that would have applied the law equally to everyone regardless of sex, gender, orientation.  It was MRAs who support gender neutrality in the law. It was MRAs working with groups like SAVE (Stop Abusive and Violent Enviroments) services and NCFM to lobby congress to adopt new gender neutral language that would protect everyone including same-sex relationships. Something that prominent feminist lobbying groups fought against. http://www.saveservices.org/ The picture you have used was made to illustrate the fact that even if feminists  achieve their fund-raising claim of supposed of ending intimate partner violence, they only work to see it ending against women. They will not have stopped intimate partner violence at all because they refuse to acknowledge that anyone but women are effected by IPV. When some lesbians began pointing out that the gendered language in laws like VAWA was not helpful or inclusive of their community they were also silenced and ignored. “Your problems stem from anti-feminism and misogyny. Now get your ass on the right side and stop trying fighting us. We have the same problem.” No. Men’s problems stem from feminism and misandry. If feminists would stop road-blocking any honest discussion of the issues both men and women (of all races, orientations, etc.) face then maybe we - all of us - face, and we can actually get something done for once. We have the same problems or at least similar, yes but a lot of the problems  today have been created, dun dun dun, by feminists. So maybe you should stop trying to silence, dismiss, and fight MRAs. Instead maybe you could listen to MRAs (not just someone who calls themself an MRA on the internet). Maybe you’ll find yourself finally getting on the right side and working for true equality. But nobody here will hold their breath, because we’ve seen years of feminists doing nothing but attacking MRAs, shouting “patriarchy hurts men” and “feminism fights for men’s rights too” all the while attacking and roadblocking anything that would make real change and anyone who refuses to regurgitate the feminists party line. Maybe you can listen to what people are saying. You might be surprised at what you will learn.

oratorasaurus:

thefourwindsbar:

Say it with me everyone:

Stopping violence against women is a fight to get women taken seriously.

Violence against men isn’t taken seriously because women are perceived as weak and fragile

When women are taken seriously, violence against men will be too.

Because right now it is culturally unfathomable that a man couldn’t defend himself against a woman.

Your problems stem from anti-feminism and misogyny. Now get your ass on the right side and stop trying fighting us. We have the same problem.

No. Women are taken far too seriously. Look at the Primary Aggressor laws, the courtroom assessment PACs, lack of due process in college rape accusations where they base everything on what the woman says, or how DNA testing to prove if someone is/is not the father doesn’t count as evidence to determine child support but the woman’s word is. 

Sorry, but us having the same problem would be that women and men BOTH get taken to jail whenever the cops respond to a domestic complaint. It would be that BOTH men and women have nearly all of their take home cash go to alimony and BOTH genders get sent to jail when they miss a month or two. It would be when BOTH genders are equally homeless and suicide victims. It would be when BOTH genders are considered disposable. It would be when hitting a man or a woman is funny and laughable and when either gender tried to defend themselves that’s when it gets real because everyone knows that men and woman simply deserve to be hit, otherwise, why would they be getting hit, right?

First off thank you for reblogging my picture thefourwindsbar but you are completely mistaken in your interpretation of it, and deliberately so I think. MRAs are the right side, feminists are not. The problem is feminists.

It was feminists who fought against gender neutral language in laws like VAWA that would have applied the law equally to everyone regardless of sex, gender, orientation.  It was MRAs who support gender neutrality in the law. It was MRAs working with groups like SAVE (Stop Abusive and Violent Enviroments) services and NCFM to lobby congress to adopt new gender neutral language that would protect everyone including same-sex relationships. Something that prominent feminist lobbying groups fought against.

http://www.saveservices.org/

The picture you have used was made to illustrate the fact that even if feminists  achieve their fund-raising claim of supposed of ending intimate partner violence, they only work to see it ending against women. They will not have stopped intimate partner violence at all because they refuse to acknowledge that anyone but women are effected by IPV.

When some lesbians began pointing out that the gendered language in laws like VAWA was not helpful or inclusive of their community they were also silenced and ignored.

“Your problems stem from anti-feminism and misogyny. Now get your ass on the right side and stop trying fighting us. We have the same problem.”

No. Men’s problems stem from feminism and misandry. If feminists would stop road-blocking any honest discussion of the issues both men and women (of all races, orientations, etc.) face then maybe we - all of us - face, and we can actually get something done for once.

We have the same problems or at least similar, yes but a lot of the problems  today have been created, dun dun dun, by feminists. So maybe you should stop trying to silence, dismiss, and fight MRAs. Instead maybe you could listen to MRAs (not just someone who calls themself an MRA on the internet). Maybe you’ll find yourself finally getting on the right side and working for true equality.

But nobody here will hold their breath, because we’ve seen years of feminists doing nothing but attacking MRAs, shouting “patriarchy hurts men” and “feminism fights for men’s rights too” all the while attacking and roadblocking anything that would make real change and anyone who refuses to regurgitate the feminists party line.

Maybe you can listen to what people are saying. You might be surprised at what you will learn.

(Source: astrodidact, via absentspirit)

Those Petulant Damsels… (by girlwriteswhat)

Reading: “The Family Terrorist”, by Erin Pizzey (by girlwriteswhat)

(Source: oratorasaurus, via oratorasaurus)

The More I Hear Feminists Describe Patriarchy, The More Patriarchy Sounds Alot Like Masculinity. Which Makes Me Wonder Just What Exactly They Are Trying To Smash.

heroinfriday:

-Morgan